File talk:Blackscorpion.jpg: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Felderburg (Created page with "==Origin?== What is the origin of this image? Specifically, is the "signature villains" line from the official CoH website? Or is this "fan made"? I ask because the Signatu...") |
imported>Felderburg m (Signing my comment) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Origin?== | ==Origin?== | ||
What is the origin of this image? Specifically, is the "signature villains" line from the official CoH website? Or is this "fan made"? I ask because the [[Signature Villains]] page has an awful lot of villains that may not necessarily be "signature" worthy on it, and if there is as official sort of grouping of signature heroes and villains, it should be used, rather than the "stick every boss / group leader on the page!" approach that seems to have been taken. | What is the origin of this image? Specifically, is the "signature villains" line from the official CoH website? Or is this "fan made"? I ask because the [[Signature Villains]] page has an awful lot of villains that may not necessarily be "signature" worthy on it, and if there is as official sort of grouping of signature heroes and villains, it should be used, rather than the "stick every boss / group leader on the page!" approach that seems to have been taken. [[User:Felderburg|Felderburg]] ([[User talk:Felderburg|talk]]) 21:38, 26 January 2015 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 21:38, 26 January 2015
Origin?
What is the origin of this image? Specifically, is the "signature villains" line from the official CoH website? Or is this "fan made"? I ask because the Signature Villains page has an awful lot of villains that may not necessarily be "signature" worthy on it, and if there is as official sort of grouping of signature heroes and villains, it should be used, rather than the "stick every boss / group leader on the page!" approach that seems to have been taken. Felderburg (talk) 21:38, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
