Talk:Patch Notes: Difference between revisions

From Unofficial Homecoming Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Adrey
No edit summary
imported>Sekoia
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
http://www.plaync.com/us/support/doc_4653.html?prod=9
== Some links ==
http://www.plaync.com/us/support/doc_4603.html
http://www.plaync.com/us/support/doc_4617.html
http://www.plaync.com/us/support/doc_4618.html


<hr>
* http://www.plaync.com/us/support/doc_4653.html?prod=9
* http://www.plaync.com/us/support/doc_4603.html
* http://www.plaync.com/us/support/doc_4617.html
* http://www.plaync.com/us/support/doc_4618.html
 
== Dates ==


I'd suggest renaming the individual patch notes pages to Patch Notes/yyyy-mm-dd so they go in order on the Category page. [[User:Adrey|Adrey]] 13:17, 22 September 2007 (EDT)
I'd suggest renaming the individual patch notes pages to Patch Notes/yyyy-mm-dd so they go in order on the Category page. [[User:Adrey|Adrey]] 13:17, 22 September 2007 (EDT)
: I agree with that suggestion. Not only does it let them sort better (which is very nice!), but it's also more clear. (Europe and the US define 1/2/07 different -- is it January 2 or February 1?) YYYY-MM-DD is an ISO standard, too. -- [[User:Sekoia|Sekoia]] 16:12, 23 September 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 20:12, 23 September 2007

Some links

Dates

I'd suggest renaming the individual patch notes pages to Patch Notes/yyyy-mm-dd so they go in order on the Category page. Adrey 13:17, 22 September 2007 (EDT)

I agree with that suggestion. Not only does it let them sort better (which is very nice!), but it's also more clear. (Europe and the US define 1/2/07 different -- is it January 2 or February 1?) YYYY-MM-DD is an ISO standard, too. -- Sekoia 16:12, 23 September 2007 (EDT)